Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Peterson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Adam Peterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable. The claim to fame appears to be untrue [1] [2]Ha! (talk) 23:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Ha! (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Ha! (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have also searched for sources. I am inclined to long for deletion if no sources are forthcoming, as per WP:N or WP:MUSIC. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 23:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC, and WP:COI. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 01:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the song for which he is supposedly best known is completely unknown to Google. No reiable sources and fails verifiabilty -- Whpq (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.