Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Firestone
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Adam Firestone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Can't see why he is notable. Some coverage but doesn't satisfy WP:BASIC scope_creep (talk) 03:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable businessman who lacks adequate coverage to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete nothing of note in the article, I would expect to see some achievements listed or recognition from independent sources but he appears to be a hard working businessman but not really notable. MilborneOne (talk) 23:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable business person.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.