Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Butterfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Butterfield

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable actor, the whole article is one claim for a guy whose roles are largely unnamed characters. Unless of course we consider "caterer" to be a super important role.... BEACHIDICAE🌊 15:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

his scenes are notable talking scenes in the movies, I'd give it a second consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alb5222 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He's an unnamed character in a bunch of non-notable films with virtually no screen time, so no. BEACHIDICAE🌊 15:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's have other editors weigh in! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alb5222 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The projects are in fact "notable", with distribution on platforms including HBO and Netflix, and premieres at major festivals. The studios have uploaded pictures of Adam's scenes on the internet movie database proving that they are in fact important scenes. Looking forward to continuing the discussion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alb5222 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — The article is an WP:ADMASQ created with a lot of unnecessary blue links, for what? I can’t tell, but what I can tell is neither WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG is met/satisfied. Obviously there’s almost little chance of AGF when an article is created by what seems to be a ”NANE”. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Absolutely no coverage and if you are most known for non-specified job roles on IMDB, you're not a notable actor. Per WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR — BriefEdits (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article do not covers the desired information and contains a lot of unnecessary stuff. Does'nt appear notable to me.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 04:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero roles of note so far in his career. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.