Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Buczek (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Buczek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted as vanity bio few years ago, recreated with some new refs/content, but it seems to still fail WP:CREATIVE. Since the last bio was deleted, he has gotten one new documentary out, and received a minor Japanese award. Neither of those seem to push him into being notable - no in-depth coverage, not (even) major reviews of his works, no indication he is considered influential in the field, and so on. WP:TOOSOON, a bit less so than 5 years ago, but still notability fail. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.