Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ad hominem
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; nominator likely violated NPA when talking about that editor. (non-admin closure) AlphaBeta135talk 17:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Ad hominem[edit]
- Ad hominem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Also, the person who made this page is stupid. Obviously, it doesn't deserve to stay, because of that.[April Fools!] TheCartoonEditor(he/him/they) (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.