Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active Transportation Alliance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 13:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Active Transportation Alliance[edit]
- Active Transportation Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article (started by the organisation in 2008) does not show that the organisation is notable. It lists goals, but no achievements or recognition. Only organising Bike The Drive is a notable thing, but that has its own article, and all information would better suit there. While the article uses the reference templates, they are not used in the proper way, and should be restyled as "external links". I tried to find Reliable Sources on the organisation, but could not find anything on them. (I could find RS mentioning the things they organise, but not about the organisation itself). EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 18:23, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- From McDonald's Cycle Center, we know that they sponsor the Chase Bike Valet (or at least use to under their prior name).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I didn't see any notable links about the company itself on Google, Google News and Yahoo aside from this small mention here.SwisterTwister talk 20:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment did you check the former name?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.