Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Ambulance (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Action_Ambulance[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous nomination for this article was on irrelevant grounds. This company does not appear to meet notability standards: it has a common name, which confounds a Google (archive) test, but a search of the Boston Globe archives through 1980 returns 38 results, all consistent with incidental or promotional coverage, and it's a local company. Beyond that, there doesn't appear to be meaningful content in the article once advertisement is removed and there appears to be a substantial conflict-of-interest history. In the interest of full disclosure, I work in EMS in Greater Boston, and not for Action. Noophilic (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The notability of the company is questionable at best, and the thorny COI edit history just makes it worse. —Tim Pierce (talk) 04:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Lack of secondary sources suggest that this company fails notability requirements. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 23:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.