Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actifed (computer virus)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actifed (computer virus)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Non-notable computer virus. SL93 (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Phalcon/Skism or delete. After looking into this a bit, I think that either Phalcon/Skism or their product the Phalcon-Skism Mass Produced Code Generator are notable. I tossed together a quick stub at Phalcon/Skism and will hopefully find time to do a bit more searching. I really couldn't find anything on Actifed, so either deletion or redirecting to the group that wrote the tool used to generate it (in the unlikely event anyone ever searches for it) seems appropriate. There's a Comparison_of_computer_viruses article that is also a popular redirect target for these kinds of articles, though we know so little about Actifed that I can't even fill out the table. So maybe best removed from that table as well... Ajpolino (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.