Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquisition (software) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 05:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Acquisition (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Abandoned file sharing client software never got much attention from reputable media as required by GNG and therefore fails the notability requirement and must be deleted. Ysangkok (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ysangkok (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions: 2009-06 no consensus

Related discussions: 2007-09 List of applications developed by David Watanabe delete, 2006-09 David Watanabe ✗ DELETE

Delete: per Nom. The sources just do not advance notability for a stand alone article. -- Otr500 (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I fail to see anything notable about this piece of software. In relation to the sourcing or really as a piece of software either. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.