Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acorn cracker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 03:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Acorn cracker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism vaguely tied to criticism of the U.S. nonprofit organization Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. Problems relating to WP:NEO and WP:RS. Warrah (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:OR, promotional, or WP:N. - Richard Cavell (talk) 13:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, per all above. WuhWuzDat 14:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research, soapbox, dictionary definition, the list goes on. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There does not appear to be any evidence that this is a notable term. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, coatrack/non-notable neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Soapbox, coatrack, non-notable neologism, unreferenced ... Acroterion _(talk) 18:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above.Jarhed (talk) 00:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unsourced neologism, with no evidence of notability, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.