Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acharya Gour Ganguly
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Acharya Gour Ganguly[edit]
- Acharya Gour Ganguly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are not multiple reliable sources independent of the subject to confer notability. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:53, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. I didn't see anything that could support the article on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment After much review, I have still found no reason (or source) that states that this person is notable, or for what. This seems to be a clear delete... Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No reason why this article should exist. This article should be a delete, there is no reason to keep this article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.