Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AceVPN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AceVPN[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is borderline when it comes to WP:NSOFT - few mentions in passing, and two decent reviews: [1] and [2]. On article's talk, User:Djm-leighpark expressed concerns about the quality of the second review, and all other sources are worse. I agree that it is probably on the wrong line of NSOFT unless better sources are found? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete: As far as I can tell through dead links and spam attackers my good faith view is the links to Turkey are tenuous and likely overblown. As seems to be usual for VPNs this goto site seems to offer a comphrenesive [3] review. Similar precedents come from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PureVPN and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gom VPN; the former being retained after a significant rewrite improvement and the latter deleted. The are from eighty to over 400 VPN providers .... very unique differentiator(s) or a large number of servers (one thousand range) are probably needed for interest in notability. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't appear to be notable, or perhaps redirect to the VPN comparison page. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 14:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough sources provided to demonstrate notability. SJK (talk) 09:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.