Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Access intelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Access intelligence[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating Access intelligence for deletion due to lack of notability. This article does have an {advert} note on it already, but after checking the provided links and doing further searches, I doubt that it can be brought to an acceptable level of referencing. References all seem to be either primary sources (quarterly reports, press releases), advertisments, or incidental listings (stock exchange records). - Article author notified.

~~Delete~~ as non-notable (as nominator).-- Elmidae (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate !vote, your nomination is your recommended course of action. Feel free to comment, though. Esquivalience ^t 01:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:CORP, although publicly-traded on the London Stock Exchange, the only sourcing available is on the company's deals and filings (normal for any publicly-traded company), not on the actual company itself. Esquivalience ^t 20:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.