Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic dress of University of Newcastle (Australia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Academic dress of University of Newcastle (Australia)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this meets WP:NOTABILITY at all, but I see that there are similar articles on a few other universities (only a fraction of the universities in the world though). Boleyn (talk) 08:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've noticed a few of these 'academic dress' articles popping up recently - Google can currently see 20 to 30 of them. Is it possible to consider them as a group and decide whether or not they are appropriate content? If they are dealt with one-by-one, it's likely that more will keep appearing on the basis that 'Wikipedia has them for other universities'. Helenabella (Talk) 07:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since nobody has voted yet, I don't see why those that don't demonstrate notability can't be added to this nomination. There are quite a few articles in Category:Academic dress by institution that seem to demonstrate notability. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article, which clearly fails to demonstrate notability of the subject. --AussieLegend (✉) 11:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete of zero interest or encyclopedic value to anyone outside the university. LibStar (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.