Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Al Hasan Al Balnubi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Assuming good faith on the WP:HEY work that took place to establish WP:GNG . There are many obscure subjects on Wikipedia, but, in academia and other realms, it's not always obscure when the correct sourcing is applied. Thank you for assuming good faith. Happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Al Hasan Al Balnubi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an obscure person, hardly known. The article says he was only discovered in recent decades. No significant coverage. Pikavoom (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have found sources which I will add to the article but probably won’t have time to do today (Arabic is fiddly). Can I ask for a relist please if this times out? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 12:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I’ve now tidied the text up, and added four references, including journals, to what was there before. Mccapra (talk) 09:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as the added references establish notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.