Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstraction methodology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems to me as advertisement, has anyone heard of this ? I propose to delete it Khalid hassani 12:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in fact it migth be a Speedy candidate. Not because it's POV or anything, but because the article doesn't actually explain what the subject is, or why it's significant. Dan 17:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It does seem to be an ad. Searching on google for "Abstraction method" UML produces a fair number documents. Weak delete for now (as article is an ad) will change vote to full delete if people no-one can verify notability, or keep if people can. --Petros471 17:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advert. Stifle 14:34, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.