Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract State Machine Language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 11:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract State Machine Language[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a stub that is not maintained. I do believe the topic deserves some mention -- see Google scholar, but probably not as its own article. Some candidates for mentioning the content would be .NET and Umple. Caleb Stanford (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – 333 -blue at 06:06, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree with keep, I think there are enough sources exists and those be ok to maintain article as stub. Jawad Haqbeen (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A quick search shows that there are many sources on this topic. There's nothing wrong with stubs. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 11:17, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.