Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract Gender

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:33, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Abstract Gender

Delete, a recently-started webcomic. FreplySpang (talk) 00:07, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete poorly written POV article about a nn webcomic that's "recently started" Soltak 00:15, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.—Encephalon | ^ζ  00:34:52, 2005-08-21 (UTC)
• Delete. Might indeed "go very far", but this isn't the place to promote it. Flowerparty ^talk 00:54, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fancraft. (Or even author-craft.) Ashibaka (tock) 01:08, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Hamster Sandwich 01:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - the page was created by a new user who hasn't received a welcome from anyone yet, the first thing they'll have noticed is their creation up for VfD. I'll go do the welcome and point them here so they know it's not personal. Alf 08:20, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Though I must agree there's certainly potential in the webcomic itself, it is as of yet not notable. --Lomedae 12:20, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep It has a couple thousand daily hits. It's poorly written, yeah, but I imagined that will eventually be fixed. It, in itself, is not a very large webcomic yet (only about two and a half months), but it does have a connection to the much large The Wotch, which is then connected to the very popular Misfile. Keep it for now... The webcomic does look pretty decent, and someone will probably come along soon enough and fix up the article a bit. Solomaxwell 02:51, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Wannablessedbe 03:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)(User has one edit -- this one.Textbook meatpuppet. Karmafist 03:18, 23 August 2005 (UTC))
• Weak Keep - While it's true the article needs to be rewritten and expanded, and it doesn't meet any of the suggested minimum requirements for a webcomic, I get the sense that this comic has a large enough fanbase to justify including it. In other words, it seems likely useful to enough people, so it should be kept. However, this assumes there is enough information to put in the article. - Matthew0028 09:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, looks like vanity. "It is unknown if She'll play main role in the future." Of course it is, unless you're the author of the comic. Dragonfiend 01:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.