Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Geschichte (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absol[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Pokemon with no SIGCOV. Most refs in the article are listicles of "the best __ pokemon".

Alternative to deletion is redirecting to the list article List of generation III Pokémon, as it is similar to other Pokemon AfDs (here here here). Natg 19 (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of generation III Pokémon#Absol not enough non-trivial coverage in the sources to show notability. Link20XX (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or redirect to list article), non-RELIABLE sourcing and lack of notability. GenQuest ^"scribble" 21:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, fails WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nominator. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to list of generation III Pokémon. The article isn't aligned with the MOS for video games' statement on what's appropriate coverage for in-game elements. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 23:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.