Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Olatunde David

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎ per creator's request, which I see no reason to not honor. (non-admin closure) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 06:27, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Olatunde David[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PR stunts; non-independent sources; fails the general notability guidelines. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. Reading Beans (talk) 06:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom after checking sources —siro χ o 10:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete more Nigerian PROMO. Nothing beyond fluff coverage for this person in the sources, or that can be found elsewhere. Oaktree b (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 3 advertorial sources and an interview. Does not pass WP:GNG. They are not independent. WP:ADMASQ. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Maliner (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete satisfied WP:FAILN.PARVAGE ^talk! 05:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or help improve please or move to draft: Greeting friends, this article has been marked for AFD, and I have tried to improve it to my best capacity so that it wouldn't be deleted. I have even asked other contributors in my community to help out with the improvement. Kindly help me improve as this is just my first article and i would like to learn more about how Wikipedia works. thank you alot. Engrdrizzy (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Engrdrizzy, and welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately not all articles are notable. Notable means they pass our rules about what subjects can have their own page. It looks like the sources used in this article were not high quality enough. That is a hard problem to fix, since better sources may not exist for this topic yet. Anyway you are welcome to keep looking for high quality sources and adding them to the article. But the sources need to be independent (no interviews, no advertorials) to pass WP:GNG. Hope this helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator and others. Doesn't even come close to meeting notability.DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.