Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Lincoln (1924 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW keep, article appears to be notable. (non-admin closure) _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Lincoln (1924 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is an obscure film made in an obscure sound film process. Yellow Sunstreaker (talk) 06:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Take a look at the Crafton source cited in the article: [1]. Not only is this an extended discussion of this film, but that source cites a bunch of newspaper sources discussing the film and, more importantly, the new sound process embodied in it. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 16:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there is one good ref and a couple of weaker ones, sufficient. Szzuk (talk) 21:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A brief article on a lost film, but its coverage in multiple books (Crafton, Reinhart) demonstrates WP:NFILM notability. AllyD (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Added references to the article, which can be found here [2]. Believe it meets notability requirements. ShoesssS ^Talk 14:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.