Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aboriginal Children's Advancement Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal Children's Advancement Society[edit]

fails WP:ORG hardly any third party coverage, [1], 2 of the 5 articles are for someone winning an award for working for this organisation, rather than an article about the organisation itself. Google search is mainly directory listings and mirror sites. LibStar (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability, less than 10 google hits. Triplestop x3 16:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~Comment~~ as noted Google News has 5 hits - one in 1966 at the Society's foundation in the Sydney Morning Herald in 1966, one of a government grant or donation of $15,000 by William Wentworth (Australian politician) in 1970 again in the SMH. Paul foord (talk) 03:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC), There are also refs to the Kirinari Hostel in the Daily Telegraph and Cth Hansard. Giving minor notability with WP:RS -- Paul foord (talk) 03:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable organisation, has sufficient reliable sources. Rebecca (talk) 06:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - perfectly good stub with some cites. I can't see what's wrong with it. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, multiple reliable sources, handily meets WP:GNG. Can't see what the problem is. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.