Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abnak records
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Very borderline, but looks like an expandable stub where most of the sources will be print. I will have a look at this one myself if no-one else does. Black Kite 07:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Abnak records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
a clear case of a non-article ... it simply does nothing Oo7565 (talk) 05:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable record label. See Google News references at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&q=%22Abnak+Records%22 --Eastmain (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep That an article is a stub is not a reason for deletion--there will probably be more material in print sources.DGG (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a memorial site. It's neither notable nor encyclopedic and most certainly doesn't merit an article. --Hu12 (talk) 17:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. What on earth do you mean by that? There is nothing here that looks anything remotely like a memorial. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, needs some work but there are some sources. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.