Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AbleNET (2)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- AbleNET (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nn chat network with 300 users. Numerous refs, but this is a ref bomb, not a real notable subject.
This article attempts to hitch a ride on events around irc-unity and the Fizzer worm. The problem is zero of the secondary sources are about AbleNET. One or two of the blog posts make a passing mention but those are not WP:RS for documentation or notability. Once you strip the article of things that do not mention AbleNET (the subject of the article), you are left with a handful of sentences that are referenced by primary sources and non-useful blogs and forum posts.
This survived AfD several years ago, before WP:N and WP:RS were really enforced and WP:ILIKEIT was seeming valid. This article doesn't meet our standards, now, if it ever did. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 14:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Looking at the sources, the nominator appears to be correct. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nominator's comments. North8000 (talk) 02:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.