Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Yadav (Indian politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Yadav (Indian politician)[edit]

Abhishek Yadav (Indian politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wrt WP:NPOL, the subject is not a(n) (inter)national or a state-level legislative body member; neither does he seem to have significant press coverage in the sense that independent in-depth coverage is absent. The only coverage he sustained was that of general news coverage and almost all of them insist that he is a relative of the Mulayam Singh Yadav's family. Were he not, he would not have received such coverage indicating the coverage would be due to the family association and in WP terms, inherited notability. Such case, the article fails WP:NPOL, WP:ANYBIO and WP:NBASIC (unless of course in-depth coverage could be uncovered which I suspect doesn't exist) ({{Notability}} tag was disputed and removed and I presume a draftification would be WP:DRAFTOBJECTed and thus WP:AFDed) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Panchayats are a level of local government in India, not a state or national legislature, so the bar he has to be measured against is WP:NPOL #2 — but the quality and depth of the sourcing here isn't getting him over that bar. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.