Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Malhan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Abhishek Malhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Abhishek Malhan is failing WP:NYOUTUBER Nomadwikiholic (talk) 20:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 20:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Internet, and Delhi. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Disagree - This article on Abhishek Malhan is not created on the basis of no. of subscribers on YouTube. He has featured on multiple popular news portal for his work like helping needy people, giveaway, pranks and participating in Indian reality show Bigg Boss. The sources are reliable, and provide significant coverage of him. SandeepKumarMeena (talk) 02:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Agree - WP:NYOUTUBER is not a criterion, rather it mentions WP:GNG and WP:ENT as qualifying criteria. The subject disqualifies WP:GNG because despite
- The subject having significant and non-trivial coverage by many independent reliable sources [1][2][3] (vide WP:ICTFSOURCES), the attention is not sustained, most of it coming from a recent reality show that the subject is taking part in (vide WP:NSUSTAINED). That being said, it is likely that the subject continues having significant coverage after the reality show has ended, as we have seen with past contestants of the reality show, and the article may be recreated at a later time when it does have sustained coverage. EnormityOP (talk) 05:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- ^ "Abhishek Malhan aka Fukra Insaan says he's not threatened by television actors on Bigg Boss OTT 2: 'TV ka zamana gaya'". The Indian Express. 2023-06-23. Retrieved 2023-06-30.
- ^ "Bigg Boss OTT 2: "Develop Character, Talent Is Not Everything," Pooja Bhatt Tells Abhishek Malhan". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2023-06-30.
- ^ "Bigg Boss OTT 2: Abhishek Malhan, Jiya Shankar and Akanksha Puri nominated for eviction, fans call the show 'biased'". Hindustan Times. 2023-06-28. Retrieved 2023-06-30.
Keep. A quick WP:BEFORE demonstrates that this individual meets GNG eg [1][2]—siroχo 10:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- The no 1 news(Outlook) you mention is clearly a paid news as there is mentioned Outlook For Brands. And as per my knowledge paid article is not acceptable. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 03:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I saw the source on WP:ICTFSOURCES. !Vote retracted —siroχo 17:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Policy based input would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)- Delete The "who is he" article is fine, but it's barely a paragraph. [3] other people talking about his attitude on the show, doesn't help establish notability. All we have is trivial coverage or descriptions of his time on the show, nothing for notability. Rest are paid or fluff pieces. Oaktree b (talk) 15:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom. Lethweimaster (talk) 11:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as 1E. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Does not yet have notability independent of Bigg Boss. The article is woefully under-referenced, but my own search for additional sources that don't talk about him in the context of that programme and might, therefore, help meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE drew a blank. Dorsetonian (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.