Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Dutt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:29, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Dutt[edit]

Abhishek Dutt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Subject is meeting WP:NPOL Bapinghosh (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Leaning towards delete because apart from one in-depth article at Hindu [1], there is nothing more to support. Being National Media Panelist, it is obvious that he will get to make statements in media. Media around his protests is not so relevant because it is political. Has he not been a councilor or at INC, perhaps no one would have talked about his protests. WP:NPOL could have met if there was more coverage on his work as the ward councilor, like the hindu one. Could become notable in future. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is nothing substantial that helps the subject to pass GNG, and it doesn't either pass the WP:NPOL criteria. ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.