Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijit Deonath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 15:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhijit Deonath[edit]

Abhijit Deonath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would've PRODed but this may be removed even though my searches clearly found nothing better than 2 local links at News and thus simply none of this suggest an actually better notable article. I've also watched this since patrolling it in December so it's certainly time for attention. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment is the film he directed notable? LibStar (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete My normal method of searching if the subject has a non-English name (Google search in home countries google) has very little hits, so safe to say he isn't notable. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete potential AUTOBIO. article reeks of self promotion. LibStar (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.