Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijeet jahazi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhijeet jahazi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The news articles mentioned here do not appear to match the titles provided in the article. Subject does not appear to qualify as notable per WP:NACTOR. KDS4444^Talk 13:28, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Woah, this is the fifth time the page has been recreated [1]. I had tagged it for speedy deletion previously. The whole article is a blatant hoax (or a test page, assuming good faith). The news articles do not match the titles and the claims are atrocious. It says "Born 26 June 2000" and yet "For his role in 's romantic drama (1999), Jahazi was awarded the Entertainer". Seriously, just delete and preferably stop the creation of another article with the same title.

As an afterthought, please consider taking some action against the article creator Abhijeet jahazi. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt per WP:SELFPROMOTION if nothing else. Also please note the editor has created this Template:Abhijeet Jahazi in another attempt to keep their article on WikiP. MarnetteD|Talk 20:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Selfpromotion and badly made to boot.*Treker (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 22:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.