Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhidnya Bhave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhidnya Bhave[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not Fits in Wikipedia Catagory UserPankajM (talk) 09:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Subject meets WP:GNG with significant coverage by Times of India. Article in its current state needs to be improved and expanded upon, though. SerChevalerie (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: In my opinion, there are at least two adequate Times of India sources contained in the article, which go towards WP:GNG, and the subject has probably done enough work to make a case for WP:NACTOR, too. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She passes general notability guidelines, including in Marathi sources. Missvain (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.