Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abella Anderson (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abella Anderson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The awards that Anderson has won are not enough to show notability. The sourcing is also very lacking. This article has on occasion been deleted in the past, and there never have been any good arguments to keep it. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of sources that discuss the subject directly and detail. No noteworthy creative or artistic contribution to the film industry. No encyclopedic relevance. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO and the WP:GNG. Virtually no independent sourcing, negligible independent reliable sourcing. There's never been a credible argument that the awards claimed by the subject met the "well-known and significant" standard, just a lot of handwaving and attempts to bootstrap claims of notability that were ultimately rooted only in promotional efforts. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.