Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullauşağı

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kalbajar District. Treat this as a bit of a "soft" close due to the minimal participation, no prejudice against restoration if sufficient sources are located about any of these localities to pass the "sufficient coverage" clause of WP:GEOLAND. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullauşağı

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ağdaş, Kalbajar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Alırzalar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Allıkənd, Kalbajar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Alolar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This is a proposal to Redirect to Kalbajar District. These mass-created stubs are nothing more than a name and location sourced to GEOnet, which could easily be covered in a table within the district article. Potential for expansion is unlikely since the villages appear to have been destroyed during the 1993 Armenian occupation. –dlthewave ☎ 01:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 01:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 01:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all - GNS spam. GEONet Names Server is not sufficient to show that a place is populated or has legal recognition, as it is not reliable for those purposes - see the recent consensus at RSN regarding this. FOARP (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.