Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Shaukat Chaudhry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Shaukat Chaudhry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unencyclopedic material. Dawnseeker2000 16:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Appears to meet WP:NPERSON through secondary coverage such as this and this. While the article is biased, poorly worded and unencyclopedic, in my opinion this is not a sufficient reason to delete it. --Rubbish computer 17:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – OK, not going to argue with that, as I really don't know my way around AfD that well; It's the ack factor that got me on this one. Dawnseeker2000 01:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 06:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not only is this simply "psychic stuff", my searches found nothing better than this and so unless he has historic and otherwise significant connections, there's nothing to suggest keeping and nothing for needing a separate article. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches turned up some brief mentions, but nothing to show they pass the notability bar. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete predicting the future? Well, there is only a limited number of possibilities, so some of a large number of astrologers will "predict" the right one, and then will fail many times predicting other things. I predict this article will be deleted, because it fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER Kraxler (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.