Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Kunde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and salt--Ymblanter (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abdullah Kunde[edit]
- Abdullah Kunde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page was prodded, but the prod was removed by an IP and more unreliable sources inserted. The two remaining sources don't seem to pass WP:RS either, but I'm not sure. The only other sources found are either polemical Muslim-Christian debate sites or Youtube videos; no news stories of any kind. Fails WP:GNG, not to mention WP:Notability (people). MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:39, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It would appear that this article was already created and speedily deleted twice before per this page...what's going on? MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt. Not a notable character per media sources.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 18:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Query: you guys are referring to WP:SALT? I just found this now. It appears that the previous versions I linked to above had a little diacretic mark above the letter "e" in "Kunde" which may have allowed the creator to jump around the deletion. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.