Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Hakim Quick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Hakim Quick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem very notable biographical article. Very few internal links. Possible self-promotion. Seaweed (talk) 19:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Islam, Saudi Arabia, Canada, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. I found one article that wasn't from their own website or from their employer, but nothing else substantial. grungaloo (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP. Besides some suspicious BLP violations, this alleged scholar literally has one cite. Also, the only similarly named LinkedIn account does not appear to be this person. Bearian (talk) 19:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: House keeping look-like promotional article about a religious person who is not notable for Wikipedia entry. Problem of SIGCOV. If any source is found, ping me! All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 12:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.