Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah AbdulRahman
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 21:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abdullah AbdulRahman[edit]
Apparently non-notable writer. Hard to say for sure, though: this name is extremely common and is most likely rendered incomplete in the article's title. A Google search brings up Abdullah Abdulrahman Mohammed Al Abdulkarim, Abdullah AbdulRahman Fahd-Al-Shammari, Abdullah Abdulrahman Al-Shraim, Abdullah Abdulrahman Ahmed Allatas, Abdullah Abdulrahman Al Shuraim, Mohamed Abdullah Abdulrahman, Abdullah Abdulrahmen Al-Mogbel, Abdullah Abdulrahman Dahem, Abdullah Abdulrahman Abdulazeez Bin Shibraen, etc., etc. Until the rest of his name is determined, his notability cannot be, and in the meantime this article is useless. There's no evidence that he passes WP:BIO at any rate. wikipediatrix 21:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom unless he can be idenitified and is notable. Strong suggestion creator is notified by nominator and asked to clarify article. Clarification within article could lead to nomination being withdrawn. Fiddle Faddle 22:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I started to do just that, but thought better of it after seeing that his talk page consisted entirely of complaints of vandalism, creating nonsense articles, and posting "may allah reward the ones who conducted them and destroy the disbelievers" to the July 2005 London bombings article. Yikes. I'd just as soon not attempt communication. wikipediatrix 01:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In which case I quite see your point. Fiddle Faddle 05:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I started to do just that, but thought better of it after seeing that his talk page consisted entirely of complaints of vandalism, creating nonsense articles, and posting "may allah reward the ones who conducted them and destroy the disbelievers" to the July 2005 London bombings article. Yikes. I'd just as soon not attempt communication. wikipediatrix 01:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The article (especially the second of its two sentences) seems to almost go out of its way to avoid being specific about what exactly he does: the vague "several media projects and organizations" is particularly awkward. No sources either. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Peta 06:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing available on him even at Google. Marwatt 13:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.