Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Haq (Taliban leader, 2005)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Haq (Taliban leader, 2005)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Searches are made difficult by the numerous people caleld Abdul Haq, including one executed by the Taliban. However, it looks as if apart from the few reports on his capture, where he gets little attention anyway, theer are no reliable indepeth sources about him, making him a clear WP:BLP1E. Fram (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable per WP:MILMOS/N, lacks 'significant independent coverage' to esablish notability. Anotherclown (talk) 13:26, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom and AC. When the article itself says "alleged" in the infobox, that says something important. No notability established and vague details about this person's life makes most of it speculative anyway. bahamut0013^words _deeds 19:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the article has almost no biographical information, which for me highlights the lack of coverage of this subject in reliable sources. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.