Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdeali Saifuddin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Dawoodi Bohra. Closing as Redirect - I never usually close on 1 !vote but after 3 weeks of being here I see no harm in redirecting. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Abdeali Saifuddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unotable person , previous precedent set to delete unnotable dai of dawoodi bora, references dont mention him :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jalal_Shamshuddin Summichum (talk) 06:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect There are some passing mentions in multiple reliable sources. I would vote for a redirect to Dawoodi Bohra. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 01:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 01:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.