Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abd al-Aziz al-Badri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator; additional sources exist on Google Books. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abd al-Aziz al-Badri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is sourced to two non-RS: khilafah.com, and a personal blog. A search of Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find any mentions. Chetsford (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SpeedyKeep - The used sources are not widely known but there is no reason provided for why "Khalifah.com" and an article by the director of the Center for Middle East Studies and Associate Professor, University of Oklahoma would not be a reliable source. Still a reason for deletion could have been that the person is not notable to wikipedia standards however a quick use of the provided google books search tool shows that this person without a doubt meets the notability standard.--Abhk1 (talk) 16:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - Withdrawing nomination. While the sources in the article still do not meet RS, as per Abhk1 subject is covered in books from mainstream publishers. I apologize, I hyphenated his name incorrectly in my initial search on Google Books. After re-checking, it appears he has received sufficient mentions to pass the GNG threshold. Chetsford (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.