Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby Hancock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abby Hancock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hancock was Miss Alaska and a local TV producer. The second point we only have sourced to a press release from her employer. The first point is sourced to a few fairly local coverage articles, but nothing that is sustained or that suggests that Hancock has reached a true level of notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Concur with nom. Winning of a state level pageant is not sufficient to establish notability. Career as journalist seems entirely routine. MB 20:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Also agree with nom. A Google search shows the Wikipedia article and mirror sites. Nothing worthy of a stand-alone article. Miss Alaska 2010 and local coverage is certainly not enough. Otr500 (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a state-level pageant win is not sufficient for notability, and there's nothing else there.. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's no actual significance or notability apart from participating at those events along with other several pageant members involved, none of this is actually suggests a meaningful improved article given there's only those events considered. SwisterTwister talk 03:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.