Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbo of Metz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 02:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abbo of Metz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to WP:TWODABS, we should generally only have a disambiguation page if the reader could possibly become confused if the page has more than two topics bearing the same name. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 06:54, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per tc Pass A Method talk 12:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as there are two people Abbo I of Metz and Abbo II of Metz and neither seems to be the primary topic. Tassedethe (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the TWODABS exception when there is no primary topic. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.