Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandon All Ships (EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abandon All Ships (EP)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the band is notable, the EP isn't. It hasn't charted or received coverage beyond its tracklisting/existance. Doesn't meet notability per WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A quick search found no RSes to support WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Abandon All Ships (or Take One Last Breath): Barely found anything about the EP. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. We have tended to delete EPs, especially early releases by bands before they became notable. I would not oppose a redirect, but there's not a lot to merge here Bearian (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.