Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abadan, Farhangian sector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm leaving this up to editors to create a redirect since no target was proposed here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abadan, Farhangian sector

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BEFORE search does not turn up any coverage, let alone significant coverage. There are some sources in the Persian Wikipedia version of the article, but they did not appear to meet SIGCOV. As a populated place without legal recognition, it is not presumed notable under WP:GEOLAND. House Blaster^talk 17:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. House Blaster^talk 17:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I redirected the article previously but was reverted. versacespace leave a message! 20:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I don't understand what was going on with the revert mentioned above, but this is clearly a matter that does not require AFD; the article can simply be redirected through the ordinary wiki process. On the other hand, as it stands, there does not appear to be any salvageable content in this article, so there would be no real difference between a delete-and-redirect and a merge-and-redirect. -- Visviva (talk) 02:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC) I see that this approach has been approved based on a 2018 RFC, although it still seems like an incredibly bad idea. -- Visviva (talk) 03:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom and WP:GEOLAND. -- Visviva (talk) 04:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If the material about the pollution issue can be sourced and merged into the main article, I would choose that; otherwise delete as is usual for non-notable city neighborhoods. Mangoe (talk) 01:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.