Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aazhakadal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aazhakadal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM as there is no content proving notability within the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:44, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Previous AfD was closed as no consensus, so this is a valid renomination. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. More sources here.

https://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/movies/azhakadal.html#cast https://malayalasangeetham.info/m.php?6847 https://www.m3db.com/film/27835
Anish Viswa 15:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those are all rubbish sources as far as establishing notability goes. As far as I can tell, they are all basic database entries like IMdB and likely list all films uncritically. The Fimlbeat source does have a link to "Critics Review", but all it says is "Critics Review Coming Soon.." and has done since 2011. SpinningSpark 11:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 08:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. There is one review in the article that the proposer seems to have overlooked, but I am not finding anything additional to establish notability. SpinningSpark 12:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have no objections to a sourced recreation, but as the article stands now it does not meet NFILM. Sam Sailor 15:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.