Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Singerman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Singerman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is very poorly referenced - citations come primarily from the website where Mr. Singerman is the editor, along with a somewhat sketchy bodybuilding blog. A check in the Google search engines finds nothing to support any independent proof of notability, as per WP:BIO requirements. It is an entertaining article, but it fails to meet WP:GNG standards. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 00:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator. This reads like a vanity article. Wefihe (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Rife with NPOV issues, majority of citations are first party promotional links. The rest are hardly WP:RS (blogs) Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.