Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Parry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 15:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Parry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Helping out an IP that's trying to do this nomination. I have no opinion, but the's bio's notability seems ripe for discussion. brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 01:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. I have also added some links. Silver seren^C 01:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Expand. I see there are quite a few google hits for his name, if the article would be expanded, there would be no grounds to for speedy deletion. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 05:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But the size of an article is not grounds for speedy deletion anyways. Silver seren^C 23:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment well, the books may be notable if the author isn't. --Bejnar (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep Two books published by known publisher. Culturalrevival (talk) 01:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have expanded it a little, and added references (mostly by the simple expedient of converting the external links to references) and deleted the unreferenced tag. I think he probably makes it as notable. --MelanieN (talk) 15:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. He is a noted author and has done other notable things. Yoninah (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Recent updates have improved this article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.