Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamjhar River

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aamjhar River

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have failed to verify that such a river exists. The references consist of two youtube videos of people standing in water bodies that seem like rivers somewhere close to Aamjhar and a google search of a bridge on the river Ahu (which flows close to Aamjher I guess). None of this actually proves that that the freakin river exists pointing to the fact that this article is probably a WP:HOAX. Sohom (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG as the only sources are YouTube videos and a Google search. Doesn’t even meet the low standards of WP:GEONATURAL. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 18:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Rajasthan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails GEONATURAL and GNG. The river does exist as an incident occurred there, but regardless, this source won't satisfy notability guidelines. Tails Wx 02:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The name is the Amajarv river on both the ISRO and MapmyIndia maps, and it is a tributary of the Ahu River not of the Kali Sindh. So the article is wrong in its basics. This is a start-again situation. Without sourcing to YouTube next time, clearly. Uncle G (talk) 11:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not that the river is short, I get it, but there is nothing important about it and large parts of the article are unsourced. HarukaAmaranth ^春 _香, 03:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.