Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamir Saleem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aamir Saleem[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-term unreferenced biography of a living person. No reliable sources found to support the text.Fails WP:V. Conflict of interest additional concern as is tone. Plad2 (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article now has two references (which would be enough to replace the "unsourced" tag with "BLPsources"). Other concerns remain.--Plad2 (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Plad2 (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 22:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Can't seem to pick up what's odd - there's a few links which also establish notability. Mar4d (talk) 13:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The references which have been added don't help much apart from establishing the fact that Saleem exists and is a musician. They don't establish his notability as per WP:MUSICBIO (which is one of the reasons why I didn't use them when I was first looking to source the article). There was a copyvio concern (notes on the article talk page) which was dealt with by reverting to an earlier text. We could stub the article even further and keep it (I've seen worse) but it still won't meet WP:MUSICBIO.--Plad2 (talk) 07:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete BLP which lacks coverage in independent reliable. The Dawn article is a start but not there yet (and it does verify the articles claim that that album was a hit). Apart from unsourced claim of numerous hits nothing else in the article would make him notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.