Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A million dollar paradox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW. Too many issues with this article to avoid deletion. Tone 22:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A million dollar paradox[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable theory; all references found in Google are self-published. ... discospinster _talk 02:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If somehow this theory turns out to be notable, it ought to be merged into Solar eclipse as a second choice. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unpublished and based upon faulty logic. (The "position" of the Sun and Moon in the sky is affected by refraction in the exact same way that light is bent in the atmosphere.) Zetawoof_(ζ) 07:08, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Textbook example of original research, and none of it is in the cited links. Zetawoof's refutation of the entire theory is also convincing. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:Fringe theory. Also the "million dollar" part not explained, so weird title.Borock (talk) 14:42, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Totally OR and non-notable. Also nonsense (the analysis assumes that the Sun rotates around the Earth), which wouldn't matter if there were multiple independent reliable sources, but there aren't any. --Lambiam 20:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.