Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A World of Possibilities (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A World of Possibilities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable radio show without sources or assertion of notability. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This MIGHT be notable. But no independent reliable sources have been presented in the six years since the previous AfD ended in keep. Unless somebody presents reliable sources indicating notabilities, I will go with the position that it is not notable. Safiel (talk) 17:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: For Chrissake, ANOTHER of those old AfDs choked with "It's syndicated so it must be notable even though there are no sources" garbage Keeps. Look, it doesn't take a brain surgeon. Are there reliable sources that meet the GNG? Great, keep. A subject is not notable until and unless those sources are produced. Glad I could clear that one up. Nha Trang 17:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.